My photographer friend Greg posted the following statement on the Canadian photographer flickr.com/group: “Recently I’ve come across a number of photographs on the social media outlets that are absolutely stunning and amazing works of art, but there are a whole host of people who comment saying ‘it looks fake’, ‘it needs to be more real’, ‘that picture has no resemblance to reality’”. And he continues raising the question with “Should we be striving to produce photographs that are more ‘real’ to please the crowds who seem to have very little understanding of art?”
My quick and easy response is to quote Plato, “Beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder”. Even Shakespeare in his work, Love’s Labours Lost writes, “Beauty is bought by judgment of the eye”.
I understand his (and others) frustration with those that are ready to condemn anything that deviates from their personal interpretation of photography, but we need to remember that is just their opinion. I don’t think Greg or any other photographer should “be striving to produce photographs…to please the crowds”. However, when one displays a photograph on any social media site one needs to be ready for someone else’s opinion.
I used the following last January in my discussion of Photography as a Fine Art. Wikipedia’s on-line encyclopedia says, “Fine art photography is photography created in accordance with the vision of the artist as photographer.” That should be enough to ease my friend’s frustration. I will comment to him that those detractors didn’t understand the interpretation or artistic vision of the photographer’s work.
Some may disagree with me, but I think photography has always been a technology driven medium. And just as there are those willing to push the limits, there surely are also those that employ their cameras simply as devices to document the people, objects, and scenes in front of them, and I have no doubt their criticism might come swiftly to those that manipulate their images instead of maintaining the more conservative course of photographic reality.
Regarding Greg’s question about some people’s understanding, or lack of understanding of art, that is a question that countless generations may have struggled with possibly since the first humans decided to place a favourite rock in their cave or put coloured pigment on the wall.
I believe the question is actually, “What is Art and who has the right to define Art?”
Mark Twain is attributed with the words, “I don’t know much about art, but I know what I like.” I expect most of us fall into that category.
Here are a number of quotes about art by artists. American architect and designer Frank Lloyd Wright said, “Art is a discovery and development of elementary principles of nature into beautiful forms suitable for human use.” However, I much preferred photographer Ansel Adams words, “Photography is more than a medium for factual communication of ideas. It is a creative art.” Or this from novelist Rainbow Rowell, “…and art wasn’t supposed to look nice; it was supposed to make you feel something.” And French Impressionist painter Edgar Degas wrote, “Art is not what you see, but what you make others see.”
When one has the need to be creative they should have the right to decide on their own particular style to fulfill their personal creative vision. What that vision is should be entirely up to the photographer, and the audience for whom the image is produced. I think the problem in this day of mass social media is how to select the right audience.
I do look forward to your comments. Thank you, John
I believe that if the photographer is going to enter into a world that HE calls ART, then he/she should be prepared for criticism, rather than immediately expecting a vote of approval, simply because they labeled it as ART rather than a Photo. I believe that it is not the problem of the spectator to accept a new presentation, but the responsibility of the Photographer to produce work that will possibly appeal to the visitor. If you want my blessing, than produce what appeals to me. If not, then don’t complain if I ignore your efforts. I may, or may not, appreciate what you are trying to do, but never tell me that I am wrong.
I think that applies to any photographic image that you show to others. I don’t think Art has anything to do with that. After all, realism in photography is essentially unattainable unless you are photographing a two dimensional object with an appropriately subdued gamut under a precise regime of colour management.
Of course you are correct. However, I think those that Greg was writing about used the term “realistic” a bit more simplistic.
For me Art, whether photographic or not, is a creation that succeeds in subliminal communication.
Thanks and well said.
Thanks John, great article. …..and great photos to go along with it.
Thank you Nancy. I am glad ya liked my article and the pictures. seeya.